Tag Archives: AEP

AEP Strains Trust of Marylanders

American Electric Power and its “little brother” Allegheny Energy want the Maryland Public Service Commission to grant permission for the construction of PATH.  (Action is suspended because the PSC told them they didn’t fill out the application properly.)

Meanwhile, the process continues in neighboring West Virginia.  The Applicant (AEP) and various intervening parties are trading testimony and interrogatories.

PATH has been criticized for being, among other things, a “coal-by-wire” project — a nearly 300-mile-long extension cord stretching from the coal-fired John Amos plant to Mt. Airy, Maryland.

“No, no, no, no” says AEP.  The one and only reason for the project is to improve the reliability of the multi-state, PJM-controlled transmission system.  This distinction is critical from a legal perspective.  After all, PJM rate-payers in Illinois and Michigan will all be paying for PATH.  The “benefit” they get in return is greater reliability.  (The Illinois Commerce Commission has challenged this very point in federal court.)

If, on the other hand, the coal-by-wire argument were true, then it would be unfair to charge rate-payers in Illinois and Michigan.  Instead, the cost of the PATH should be paid by either (or both) the generating plants and the consumers who benefit.  If that were to happen, then the project would probably not be built.

The fate of PATH turns on the answer to the question: Is it about reliability or coal-by-wire?

Let’s see… AEP proposed construction of PATH after AEP joined PJM.  PATH would provide a physical connection between AEP-owned John Amos plant and lucrative East Coats markets.  And yet, AEP argues that PATH has nothing to do with increasing sales from AEP-owned generating plants like John Amos.

Instead, PATH is an altruistic, community-spirited project intended to help everybody connected to the PJM system.

The PATH transmission project was identified to resolve a number of reliability criteria violations. In doing so, the PATH Project will enhance the ability of all generating resources in PJM, in aggregate, to be delivered to the aggregate customer load on the PJM system. The PATH project is neither intended to deliver any one specific generating resource or class of generating resources, nor is it designed to promote the future development of any class of new generation.

(This quote is from the Applicant’s response to Sierra-III-72 dated September 15, 2009, in West Virginia Public Service Commission Case No. 09-0770-E-CN.  This and other materials related to the case are available on the PSC website.)

9 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

What is the status of Project Mountaineer?

You remember Project Mountaineer — the dream of expanding coal-fired electrical generation in the Ohio Valley and shipping it to the East Coast via massive new transmission lines.  

Project Mountaineer was the first child of the October 1, 2004, marriage of AEP and PJM.

They don’t call it that anymore, but the basic “coal-by-wire” concept remains intact.  Each year, PJM publishes a new version of its Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (RTEP).  The plan includes many transmission facilities large and small, but the most controversial are the huge , interstate power lines:

The Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway (MAPP) would run for 220 miles from Virginia, across the Chesapeake Bay and up the Delmarva Peninsula to New Jersey at an estimated cost of $1.4 billion.

The Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) would start in southwestern Pennsylvania, cut across West Virginia and end in Northern Virginia.  

The Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) is proposed to run for 290 miles from AEP’s John Amos coal plant in southern West Virginia to the Kemptown substation in central Maryland.

The Susquehanna-Roseland project would connect northeastern Pennsylvania with northern New Jersey.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized